Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A two-stage Bayesian method for estimating accuracy and disease prevalence for two dependent dichotomous screening tests when the status of individuals who are negative on both tests is unverified

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jul 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jin Liu
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheng Luo
12 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Stamey
28 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jin Liu
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jin Liu
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
23 Sep 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-14-110

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement