Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Jul 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Emma France
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zachary Munn
5 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Britten
3 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Emma France
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Emma France
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Oct 2014 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-14-119

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement