Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Amelie Yavchitz |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Aug 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - nikolaos pandis |
| 25 Sep 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer |
| 29 Oct 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Amelie Yavchitz |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Oct 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Nov 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Nov 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-123 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
