Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparative efficiency research (COMER): meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness studies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jul 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Carlos Crespo
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - José Manuel Rodriguez Barrios
6 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Inigo Gorostiza
24 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Carlos Crespo
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Carlos Crespo
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Carlos Crespo
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
20 Nov 2014 Editorially accepted
22 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-14-139

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement