Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Detecting and correcting the bias of unmeasured factors using perturbation analysis: a data-mining approach

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 May 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
29 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yasutaka Chiba
18 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cole Chapman
23 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Gustafson
13 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Wen-Chung Lee
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Gustafson
30 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cole Chapman
2 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yasutaka Chiba
4 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Wen-Chung Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yasutaka Chiba
24 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Wen-Chung Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
5 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-14-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement