Skip to main content

Table 1 Prevalence of experience and reported impact of different factors on access to potential participants as reported by 98 CSOs

From: Influences on recruitment to randomised controlled trials in mental health settings in England: a national cross-sectional survey of researchers working for the Mental Health Research Network

  

A. Has participant experience of factor?

B. Participants assessment of the influence of factor on access to participants

  

Valid responses = 98 (unless stated)

Enhances access

Makes no difference

Inhibits access

  

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

 

Site management position re. trial

    

1

Gatekeepers refer to the NHS commitment to patient participation in research

41 (41.8)

68 (69.4)

28 (28.6)

2 (2.0)

2

Gatekeepers have protected time to undertake research activity

55 (56.1)

81 (82.7)

8 (8.2)

9 (9.2)

3

Service management proactively endorse the trial and promote referral to the study

77 (78.6)

93 (94.9)

4 (4.1)

1 (1.0)

4

Managers instruct gatekeepers to refer potential participants

76 (77.6)

83 (84.7)

9 (9.2)

6 (6.1)

5

An identified member of the gatekeeping team is responsible for facilitating referral

76 (77.6)

80 (81.6)

15 (15.3)

3 (3.1)

 

Trial design

    

6

Concurrent recruitment to multiple trials at research site

89/97 (90.8)

11 (11.3)

24 (24.7)

62 (63.9)

7

Trial design is non-simple

78/97 (79.6)

0 (0)

26 (26.8)

71 (73.2)

8

Gatekeepers are masked to treatment allocation

88/97 (89.8)

5 (5.2)

68 (70.1)

24 (24.7)

 

Site characteristics

    

9

Site is undergoing substantial change such as reconfiguration or restructuring

92 (93.9)

0 (0)

3 (3.1)

95 (96.9)

 

Relationship between recruitment and clinic procedures

    

10

Trial participation requires ongoing involvement of the gatekeeper (e.g. enabling attendance at an intervention/completing outcome measures)

84 (85.7)

12 (12.2)

10 (10.2)

76 (77.6)

11

Referral to the trial requires gatekeepers to complete questionnaires or an interview about themselves

45 (45.9)

3 (3.1)

17 (17.3)

78 (79.6)

12

Assessment of eligibility is integrated with routine clinical processes (e.g. case review)

68 (69.4)

90 (91.8)

6 (6.1)

2 (2.0)

13

Referral requires gatekeepers to complete questionnaires or an interview about trial participants

80 (81.6)

6 (6.1)

12 (12.2)

80 (81.6)

 

Characteristics of the trial intervention

    

14

The trial intervention is only accessible through referral to the trial

95 (96.9)

52 (53.1)

25 (25.5)

21 (21.4)

15

Gatekeepers hold views about the effectiveness and/or appropriateness of the trial intervention (gatekeeper would not accept that equipoise exists)

93/97 (94.9)

7 (7.2)

6 (6.2)

84 (86.6)

 

Trial marketing

    

16

Trial investigators have a structured approach to promoting the trial to gatekeepers

81 (82.7)

76 (77.6)

17 (17.3)

5 (5.1)

17

A senior member (e.g. principal investigator) of the research team meets with gatekeepers to promote the trial

74 (75.5)

89 (90.8)

8 (8.2)

1 (1.0)

18

Gatekeepers receive structured updates (e.g. regular newsletters/formal feedback at meetings) about recruitment progress

90 (91.8)

82 (83.7)

15 (15.3)

1 (1.0)

19

The trial is marketed directly to the target population (with a view to potential participants seeking referral)

90 (91.8)

87 (88.8)

10 (10.2)

1 (1.0)

 

Service user involvement

    

20

Members of the target population (those potentially affected by trial outcomes) promote referral to the trial, with gatekeepers

39/97 (39.8)

87 (89.7)

10 (10.3)

0 (0)

21

Gatekeepers are advised that the target population has been involved in the trial design and/or implementation

79 (80.6)

69 (70.4)

28 (28.6)

0 (0)

 

Clinician attitudes

    

22

Researchers share the professional background of the gatekeeper

78 (79.6)

58 (59.2)

39 (39.8)

1 (1.0)

23

Gatekeepers express a personal interest in research

93 (94.9)

94 (95.9)

2 (2.0)

2 (2.0)

24

Gatekeepers base referral on criteria other than those specified in the trial protocol (i.e. they make referrals on the basis of their opinion about suitability)

85/94 (86.7)

11 (11.7)

12 (12.8)

72 (76.6)

25

Gatekeepers believe trial participation will negatively affect their relationship with potential participants

76 (77.6)

1 (1.0)

5 (5.1)

92 (93.9)

 

Incentives/motivational interventions

    

26

Incentives (e.g. chocolates/prize draw) are provided to gatekeepers for the referral of potential participants

54 (55.1)

70 (71.4)

26 (26.5)

2 (2.0)

27

Researchers encourage competition between study sites in relation to recruitment

86 (87.8)

48 (49.0)

47 (48.0)

3 (3.1)

28

Researchers are set specific recruitment targets which are monitored by their management

96 (98.0)

54 (55.1)

40 (40.8)

4 (4.1)

29

Site recruitment targets (number of participants and/or time frames) are agreed with gatekeepers

75 (76.5)

57 (58.2)

37 (37.8)

4 (4.1)