|
Patient voice or engagement (1)
|
Engage service users in driving research process. Giving users a ‘voice’ in the evaluation of a health technology of which they will be the recipients
|
|
Optimise the trial process / Develop the best processes to maximise the success of the trial (4)
|
Optimise overall trial process
|
|
Phase 1: Develop qualitative model to understand perceptions and inform strategies for full trial
|
|
Phase 2: Modify trial procedures and documentation in feasibility phase
|
|
Improve recruitment and consent procedures for main trial (2)
|
Development of training programme with individual feedback for staff involved in recruitment. Recommend recruitment strategies most likely to promote recruitment into the main trial
|
|
To pilot and develop trial procedures including modeling consent procedures for main trial
|
|
Generate theories and models to guide intervention development (2)
|
Build conceptual model of [] preferences that will be explored in a subgroup of randomised [participants]
|
|
Gain an insider’s perspective from which a theoretical framework regarding subjective experience of service users can be developed
|
|
Generate theories to guide the trial and health community (1)
|
Develop theoretical model of HTA practice / Develop a critical understanding of social processes and practices implicated in development, implementation and dissemination of a RCT in the field of HTA
|
|
Optimise implementation into clinical practice (6)
|
Inform future development of services of this intervention
|
|
Process evaluation will provide important generalizable information for wider health community about acceptability [in service]
|
| |
Inform the roll out of the intervention to the wider community
|
|
Inform commissioners and service providers to contribute to maximisation of quality and uptake of [intervention]
|
|
Assess the feasibility of delivering [intervention] in NHS
|
|
Interpret trial findings (especially unexpected findings) (5)
|
Understand and explain any differences in outcome between intervention sites
|
|
Insight into possible explanations for differential success of intervention
|
|
Interpret trial results to understand why intervention did work / work to further interpret and illuminate the findings from the trial itself
|
|
Influence the interpretation of the outcome data / identify unanticipated outcomes and barriers to change
|
|
Other (5)
|
Understand, as well as quantify, the process and outcome of care
|
|
Bring together the views of different research participants
|
|
Explore range of resource use for economic analysis
|
|
Provide new insights into patients’ views and experiences of [intervention] and usual care
|
|
Provide a richer understanding of patient and carer perceptions to complement quantitative data
|
