From: Efficient clinical evaluation of guideline quality: development and testing of a new tool
iCAHE | AGREE II | |
---|---|---|
AGREE II Domain 1: Scope & Purpose | Q13 Are the purpose and target users of the guideline stated? | Q1. The overall objectives of the guideline are specifically described |
Q2. The health questions covered by the guideline are specifically described | ||
Q3. The population to whom the guideline is meant to apply is specifically described | ||
Q6. The target users are clearly defined | ||
AGREE II Domain 2: Stakeholder involvement | Q11. Are the developers clearly stated? | Q4. The guideline development group includes individuals from all relevant professional groups |
Q12. Does the qualifications and expertise of the guideline developers link with the purpose of the guideline and its end users? | Q5. The views and preferences of the target population have been sought | |
Q7. Does the guideline provide an outline of the strategy used to find underlying evidence? | Q7. Systematic methods were used to search for the evidence | |
Q8. Does the guideline use a hierarchy to rank the quality of the underlying evidence? | Q8. The criteria for selecting the evidence are clearly described | |
Q9. Does the guideline appraise the quality of the evidence which underpins its recommendations? | Q9. The strengths and limitations of the body of evidence are clearly described | |
Q10. Does the guideline link the hierarchy and quality of underlying evidence to each recommendation? | Q10. The methods for formulating the recommendations are clearly described | |
AGREE II Domain 3: Rigour of Development | Q11. The health benefits, side effects and risks have been considered in formulating the recommendations | |
Q12. There is an explicit link between the recommendations and the supporting evidence | ||
Q13. The guideline has been eternally reviewed by experts prior to its publication | ||
Q14. A procedure for updating the guideline is provided | ||
New iCAHE instrument Domain: Currency | Q4. Is there a date of completion available? | |
Q5. Does the guideline provide an anticipated review date? | ||
Q6. Does the guideline provide dates for when literature was included? | ||
AGREE II Domain 4: Clarity of Presentation | Q14. Is the guideline readable and easy to navigate? | Q15. The recommendations are specific and unambiguous |
Q16. The different options for management of the condition or health issues are clearly presented | ||
Q17. Key recommendations are easily identifiable | ||
AGREE II Domain 5: Applicability | Q18. The guideline describes facilitators and barriers to its application | |
Q19. The guideline provides advice and/or tools on how the recommendations can be put into practice | ||
Q20. The potential resources implications of applying the recommendations have been considered | ||
Q21. The guideline presents monitoring and/or auditing criteria | ||
AGREE II Domain 6: Editorial Independence | Q22. The views of the funding body have not influenced the content of the guideline | |
Q23. Competing interests of guideline development group members have been recorded and addressed | ||
New iCAHE instrument Domain: Availability | Q1. Is the guideline readily available in full text? | |
Q2. Does the guideline provide a complete reference list? | ||
New iCAHE instrument Domain: Summary | Q3. Does the guideline provide a summary of its recommendations? |