Comparison of two data collection processes in clinical studies: electronic and paper case report forms
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ling Zhao|
|22 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kamala Thriemer|
|29 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adam Wilcox|
|2 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - meredith nahm|
|28 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Corinne Alberti|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kamala Thriemer|
|11 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adam Wilcox|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Dec 2013||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-14-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.