Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of two data collection processes in clinical studies: electronic and paper case report forms

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ling Zhao
22 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kamala Thriemer
29 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Wilcox
2 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - meredith nahm
28 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Corinne Alberti
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kamala Thriemer
11 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Wilcox
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
31 Dec 2013 Editorially accepted
17 Jan 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-14-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement