Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of included studies

From: The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner’s survey response rates – a systematic review

Study ID

Allocation concealed?

Randomisation performed?

Blinding of participants & personnel?

Complete outcome data?

Absence of reporting bias?

Absence of other bias?

ITT analysis?

Monetary incentives

       

1. Asch et al., 1998 [26]

?

?

2. Deehan et al.,1997 [11]

?

?

?

?

3. Everett et al.,1997 [28]

?

?

?

4. James et al., 2011 [27]

?

?

?

X

Non-monetary incentives

5. Baron et al., 2001 [29]

?

?

?

6. McLaren and Shelley, 2000 [30]

?

?

?

?

X

7. Pit et al., 2013 [25]

X

X

?

8. Robertson et al.,2005 [31]

?

?

?

9. Thomson et al.,2004 [32]

?

?

?

?

Questionnaire design/ mode of delivery

10. Drummond et al., 2008 [34]

?

11. Hocking et al., 2006 [35]

X

?

?

12. Shosteck and Fairweather,1979 [36]

?

?

13.Seguin et al.,2004 [37]

?

?

?

14. Scott et al., 2011 [24]

X

X

?

Other design based strategies

15. Akl et al., 2011 [41]

X

?

?

?

16. Bonevski et al., 2011[40]

?

?

?

?

17. Gattellari et al., 2012[13]

X

X

?

18. Gupta et al.,1997 [39]

?

?

?

?

19. Maheux et al., 1989[42]

?

?

?

?

20. Olivarius and Andreasen, 1995 [43]

X

?

?

21. Pedrana et al.,2008 [44]

X

?

?

?

22. Pirotta et al.,1999 [38]

?

23. Ward et al., 1998 [33]

X

?

  1. Legend:
  2. ?→Unclear.
  3. X→No.
  4. √→Yes.