Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Sep 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Oct 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Abel
24 Oct 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Norma Terrin
4 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Baker
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Baker
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Baker
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Nov 2002 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2002 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-2-13

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement