This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The probability of cost-effectiveness
© O'Hagan and Stevens; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002
Received: 17 December 2001
Accepted: 11 March 2002
Published: 11 March 2002
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Dec 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jan 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Willan|
|5 Feb 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Heitjan|
|26 Feb 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Anthony O'Hagan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Feb 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Mar 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Willan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Mar 2002||Editorially accepted|
|11 Mar 2002||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-2-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.