This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?
© Feise; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002
Received: 15 March 2002
Accepted: 17 June 2002
Published: 17 June 2002
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Mar 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Apr 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mikel Aickin|
|24 Apr 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tom Cleophas|
|30 May 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ronald Feise|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 May 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jun 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mikel Aickin|
|14 Jun 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ronald Feise|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Jun 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Jun 2002||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jun 2002||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-2-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.