Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jul 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Sep 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
13 Sep 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer
6 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Antje Timmer
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Nov 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer
10 Dec 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
18 Jan 2003 Author responded Author comments - Antje Timmer
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jan 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jan 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
6 Feb 2003 Author responded Author comments - Antje Timmer
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Feb 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Feb 2003 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2003 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-3-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement