Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Apr 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
28 May 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claudio Jose Struchiner
10 Jun 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - james DEDDENS
7 Aug 2003 Author responded Author comments - Aluisio J D Barros
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Aug 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Aug 2003 Author responded Author comments - Aluisio J D Barros
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Aug 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Aug 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - james DEDDENS
11 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claudio Jose Struchiner
18 Sep 2003 Author responded Author comments - Aluisio J D Barros
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Sep 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Oct 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - james DEDDENS
11 Oct 2003 Author responded Author comments - Aluisio J D Barros
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Oct 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Oct 2003 Editorially accepted
20 Oct 2003 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement