Skip to main content

Table 6 Absolute frequencies, outcome prevalences, exposure prevalences, crude and pooled prevalence ratio (PR) estimates, and relative confounding for the analysis of the modified data using mother in a paid job as the outcome, father living with the family as the risk factor and social class as confounder (situation 3 modified).

From: Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio

First stratum: High social class

 

Mother employed

No

All

 
 

N

Prev.

N

N

Prev. exp. = 15.0%

Father Present

73

90.1%

8

81

PR = 1.80

No

230

50.0%

230

460

M-H weight = 34.44

All

303

56.0%

238

541

 

Second stratum: Low social class

 

Mother employed

No

All

 
 

N

Prev.

N

N

Prev. exp.= 80.0%

Father Present

295

56.0%

232

527

PR = 1.39

No

53

40.2%

79

132

M-H weight = 42.38

All

348

52.8%

311

659

 

Combined strata: High and low social class

 

Mother employed

 

No

All

Prev. exp.= 50.7%

 

N

Prev.

N

N

PR (crude) = 1.27

Father Present

368

60.5%

240

608

PR (M-H) = 1.58

No

283

47.8%

309

592

Confounding = 24.6%

All

651

54.3%

549

1200

P-value(het) *= 0.01

  1. * P-value for testing heterogeneity of the prevalence ratios across strata.