Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Erratum to: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?

  • The original article was published in BMC Medical Research Methodology 2002 2:13

Dr. Carlos Campillo, Hospital Universitario Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, kindly pointed out that in the paragraph prior to the conclusion, it should read "Figure 3" instead of "Figure 2" and that in the last two sentences of that paragraph, it should read "gram-positive" instead of "gram-negative" [1].

References

  1. 1.

    Baker SG, Kramer BS: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002, 2: 13-10.1186/1471-2288-2-13.

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/23/prepub

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Stuart G Baker.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1186/1471-2288-2-13

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, S.G., Kramer, B.S. Erratum to: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?. BMC Med Res Methodol 3, 23 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-23

Download citation