- Erratum
- Open Access
- Published:
Erratum to: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?
BMC Medical Research Methodology volume 3, Article number: 23 (2003)
The Original Article was published on 13 November 2002
Dr. Carlos Campillo, Hospital Universitario Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, kindly pointed out that in the paragraph prior to the conclusion, it should read "Figure 3" instead of "Figure 2" and that in the last two sentences of that paragraph, it should read "gram-positive" instead of "gram-negative" [1].
References
Baker SG, Kramer BS: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002, 2: 13-10.1186/1471-2288-2-13.
Pre-publication history
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/23/prepub
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1186/1471-2288-2-13
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, S.G., Kramer, B.S. Erratum to: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?. BMC Med Res Methodol 3, 23 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-23
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-23