Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Aug 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Dawes|
|17 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frederick Burge|
|22 Sep 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Marshall Godwin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Sep 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Dawes|
|11 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frederick Burge|
|15 Dec 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Marshall Godwin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Dec 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2003||Editorially accepted|
|22 Dec 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-3-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.