Skip to main content

Table 1 Error analysis using Anaissie et al. data

From: Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis

 

≈ c

           

≈ d

 

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.7

0.9

1.2

1.5

1.7

2.0

1.0

-.286

-.272

-.259

-.245

-.232

-.197

-.162

-.128

-.096

-.064

.033

1.7

-.198

-.186

-.175

-.163

-.152

-.122

-.093

-.064

-.036

-.009

.018

2.4

-.131

-.121

-.111

-.101

-.091

-.065

-.039

-.014

.011

.035

.059

3.0

-.077

-.068

-.059

-.050

-.041

-.018

.005

.028

.050

.072

.093

3.7

-.032

-.024

-.016

-.008

.021

.042

.063

.083

.103

.123

5.6

.062

.069

.075

.082

.089

.106

.123

.140

.156

.173

.189

7.5

.131

.136

.142

.147

.153

.168

.182

.196

.211

.225

.238

9.4

.183

.188

.193

.198

.203

.229

.241

.254

.266

.278

11.2

.226

.231

.235

.239

.244

.255

.267

.278

.289

.300

.311

13.1

.262

.266

.270

.274

.278

.288

.299

.309

.319

.329

.339

15.0

.293

.296

.300

.303

.307

.317

.326

.335

.345

.354

.363

Back to article page

BMC Medical Research Methodology

ISSN: 1471-2288

Contact us