From: How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?
Item # | Description |
---|---|
1. | Was the spectrum of patients representative of the patients who will receive the test in practice? |
2. | Were selection criteria clearly described? |
3. | Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition? |
4. | Is the time period between reference standard and index test short enough to be reasonably sure that the target condition did not change between the two tests? (disease progression bias) |
5. | Did the whole sample or a random selection of the sample, receive verification using a reference standard of diagnosis? (partial verification bias) |
6. | Did patients receive the same reference standard regardless of the index test result? (differential verification bias) |
7. | Was the reference standard independent of the index test (i.e. the index test did not form part of the reference standard)? (incorporation bias) |
8. | Was the execution of the index test described in sufficient detail to permit replication of the test? |
9. | Was the execution of the reference standard described in sufficient detail to permit its replication? |
10. | Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? (test review bias) |
11. | Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test? (diagnostic review bias) |
12. | Were the same clinical data available when test results were interpreted as would be available when the test is used in practice? (clinical review bias) |
13. | Were uninterpretable/ intermediate test results reported? |
14. | Were withdrawals from the study explained? |