Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression analysis of individual quality criteria versus year-of-publication of the manuscripts identified by the PubMed MEDLINE search This table lists the results of the regression analyses comparing year-of-publication against the individual quality criteria.

From: Effects of the search technique on the measurement of the change in quality of randomized controlled trials over time in the field of brain injury

quality criterion

regression result

(W = Wald stat)

Cox & Snell R2

regression line

the assessment of the distribution of patient characteristics and prognostic factors between groups

W = 0.96, P = 0.33

0.01

y = -0.075x + 9.45

prevention of the movement of patients between groups after allocation, and the use of intention-to-treat analysis

W = 1.63, P = 0.20

0.02

y = 0.088x - 10.30

the blinding of the patients to the treatment they received

W = 0.30, P = 0.58

0.003

y = 0.022x - 0.80

the blinding of the health care providers to the treatments received by the patients

W = 2.00, P = 0.16

0.02

y = 0.055x - 5.71

the blinding of the outcome observer to the treatment received by the patient

W = 0.01, P = 0.93

0.000

y = 0.003x + 0.57

adequacy of follow-up

W = 0.03, P = 0.86

0.000

y = -0.006x + 1.18

allocation concealment

W = 1.06, P = 0.30

0.011

y = 0.39x - 78.4