Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Sequential boundaries approach in clinical trials with unequal allocation ratios

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Mar 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
16 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric BELLISSANT
18 Jun 2005 Author responded Author comments - peyman Jafari
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jun 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Jun 2005 Author responded Author comments - peyman Jafari
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jun 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric BELLISSANT
28 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - peyman Jafari
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Sep 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric BELLISSANT
15 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - peyman Jafari
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 6
16 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - peyman Jafari
Resubmission - Version 7
16 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
16 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - peyman Jafari
Resubmission - Version 9
16 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
13 Jan 2006 Editorially accepted
13 Jan 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-6-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement