Skip to main content

Table 6 Optimal combinations of (n opt , k opt ) which minimize the variance of θ ^ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaaiiGacuWF4oqCgaqcaaaa@2E79@ for N = 24.

From: Interval estimation and optimal design for the within-subject coefficient of variation for continuous and binary variables

θ

ρ

 

0.6

0.7

0.8

 

(n opt , k opt )

0.1

(6.77, 3.54)

(5.63, 4.26)

(4.54, 5.29)

0.2

(3.89, 6.17)

(3.31, 7.24)

(2.77, 8.67)

0.3

(2.91, 8.23)

(2.54, 9.47)

(2.17, 11.05)

0.4

(2.44, 9.82)

(2.16, 11.12)

(1.88, 12.74)

Back to article page

BMC Medical Research Methodology

ISSN: 1471-2288

Contact us