Patient acceptability of larval therapy for leg ulcer treatment: a randomised survey to inform the sample size calculation of a randomised trial
© Petherick et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 31 May 2006
Accepted: 01 September 2006
Published: 01 September 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 May 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jul 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Jeffcoate|
|14 Jul 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - TJ Ryan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Aug 2006||Author responded||Author comments - E Andrea Nelson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|28 Aug 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|1 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - E Andrea Nelson|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|1 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|1 Sep 2006||Editorially accepted|
|1 Sep 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-6-43|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.