Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beverley Shea
2 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marion Campbell
14 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marion Campbell
4 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beverley Shea
14 Jul 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jul 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beverley Shea
5 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Rudolf W. Poolman
Resubmission - Version 7
8 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
11 Sep 2006 Editorially accepted
11 Sep 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-6-44

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement