Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment scores of included studies

From: Maximising response to postal questionnaires – A systematic review of randomised trials in health research

Author

Random-isation performed?

Allocation concealed?

Similar baseline characteristics?

Eligibility criteria specified?

Blind outcome assessment?

Adequate reporting of results?

ITT analysis?

No performance bias?

Quality score

Dorman 1997

?

?

?

A

Dunn 2003

?

X

A

Evans 2004

?

?

X

?

B

Iglesias 2000

X

A

Jenkinson 2003

?

?

?

X

?

D

Jones a,b 2000

?

?

X

?

X

?

D

Leigh Brown 1997

?

?

?

?

B

McColl a,b 2003

?

X

A

Parkes 2000

?

?

?

?

B

Salim Silva 2002

?

?

X

?

B

Sutherland 1996

?

?

X

?

B

Tai 1997

?

X

?

?

B

Ward 1996

?

?

X

?

X

?

D

  1. To score:
  2. 5 or more √ = Good: A
  3. 2–4 √ = Moderate: B
  4. 4 or more X = Poor: C
  5. 4 or more ? = Unclear: D