From: Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
a) Review details |
b) Content of the tool: |
   • Did QUADAS cover all important items? |
   • Were any QUADAS items omitted, added or modified? |
c) Background document: |
   • Was the background document easy to understand? |
   • Were scoring instructions understandable? |
   • Should any items have been scored differently? |
d) Technical points |
   • How long did it take to complete QUADAS? |
   • Was inter-rater reliability assessed? |
e) Overall conclusions |
   • Reviewers were asked to rate coverage, ease of use, clarity of instructions, and validity (whether QUADAS helped to distinguish between studies of different qualities) on a five point scale |
   • Would you us QUADAS again? |
f) Additional questions |
   • How were the results of quality incorporated into the review? |
   • Was a training session organised to ensure reviewers applied the tool consistently? |
   • Reviewer details, including age, experience, professional background |
   • Have you previously been involved in the quality assessment of studies included in a systematic review? |
g) Final comments |