Improving response rates using a monetary incentive for patient completion of questionnaires: an observational study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Nov 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Dec 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Phil Edwards|
|15 Dec 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marie Pirotta|
|29 Dec 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl|
|15 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Gates|
|24 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Stirling Bryan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elaine McColl|
|20 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Gates|
|21 Feb 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Stirling Bryan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Feb 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Feb 2007||Editorially accepted|
|27 Feb 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-7-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.