Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Recruitment and retention in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Bell's palsy: A case study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Sep 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tom Trikalinos
19 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Bower
23 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carien Beurskens
28 Feb 2007 Author responded Author comments - Brian McKinstry
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Feb 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Bower
7 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carien Beurskens
22 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Brian McKinstry
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Brian McKinstry
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Mar 2007 Editorially accepted
28 Mar 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-7-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement