Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Pragmatic trials in primary care. Methodological challenges and solutions demonstrated by the DIAMOND-study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Feb 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Dawes
7 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek
28 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gerdine Adriana Johanna Fransen
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shaun Treweek
2 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brendan Delaney
6 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gerdine Adriana Johanna Fransen
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gerdine Adriana Johanna Fransen
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Gerdine Adriana Johanna Fransen
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Apr 2007 Editorially accepted
23 Apr 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-7-16

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement