Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of participants and non-participants in the PRO-AGE study at the three study sites

From: The PRO-AGE study: an international randomised controlled study of health risk appraisal for older persons based in general practice

 

London (U.K.)

 

Hamburg (Germany) *

 

Solothurn (Switzerland)

 
 

Participants

Non-participants

P-value

Participants

Non-participants

P-value

Participants

Non-participants

P-value

Randomised study

Age (years)

74.6 ± 6.3 (2503)

75.7 ± 7.3 (1292)

<.0001

71.8 ± 7.6 (2580)

71.3 ± 8.1 (1234)

0.10

74.5 ± 6.0 (2284)

74.8 ± 6.8 (1098)

0.68

Female gender

54.9% (1375/2503)

58.3% (753/1292)

0.12

62.7% (1617/2580)

62.1% (821/1322)

0.70

56.6% (1293/2284)

52.7% (579/1098)

0.03

Concurrent comparison group

Age (years)

74.9 ± 6.5 (636)

75.9 ± 7.5 (667)

0.01

72.0 ± 8.2 (746)

71.3 ± 8.5 (631)

0.31

74.2 ± 6.0 (1171)

75.1 ± 6.8 (687)

0.01

Female gender

57.6% (366/636)

57.4% (383/667)

0.63

68.1% (508/746)

63.7% (690/1084)

0.001

57.0% (667/1171)

60.0% (412/687)

0.32

  1. PRO-AGE: PRevention in Older people – Assessment in GEneralists' practices
  2. Values are percentages (nominator/denominator) or means ± standard deviations (denominator).
  3. P-values based on multivariable logistic regression models including age and gender.
  4. * In Hamburg, information on age and gender was in part missing amongst non-participants due to state-mandated data protection regulations.