Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jan 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Staton
2 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Lagoe
18 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Soe Soe Thwin
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Staton
23 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Lagoe
21 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Soe Soe Thwin
Resubmission - Version 3
21 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Lagoe
24 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Soe Soe Thwin
Resubmission - Version 4
24 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Soe Soe Thwin
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Soe Soe Thwin
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Soe Soe Thwin
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
18 Jun 2007 Editorially accepted
18 Jun 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-7-23

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement