Skip to main content

Table 2 Allocation of retrievals in the manual review (3 GLAD-strategies, 9 diseases)

From: Developing search strategies for clinical practice guidelines in SUMSearch and Google Scholar and assessing their retrieval performance

Allocation of retrievals Unique and relevant retrievals Non-relevant retrievals and duplicates Total
SUMSearch    
Strategy tested unique and relevant retrievals; no duplicates non-relevant retrievals removed from manual review; duplicates of:
- relevant retrievals
- non-relevant retrievals
raw retrievals; duplicates between PubMed and NGC
Strategies not tested unique and relevant retrievals; no duplicates non-relevant retrievals removed from manual review; duplicates of and between:
- relevant retrievals
- non-relevant retrievals
raw retrievals; duplicates of and between retrievals
All strategies unique and relevant retrievals; no duplicates non-relevant retrievals removed from manual review; duplicates of and between:
- relevant retrievals
- non-relevant retrievals
raw retrievals; duplicates of and between retrievals
Google Scholar    
Strategy tested unique and relevant retrievals; no duplicates non-relevant retrievals removed from manual review; duplicates of:
- relevant retrievals
- non-relevant retrievals
raw retrievals; duplicates between singular and plural
Strategies not tested unique and relevant retrievals; no duplicates non-relevant retrievals removed from manual review; duplicates of and between:
- relevant retrievals
- non-relevant retrievals
raw retrievals; duplicates of and between retrievals
All strategies unique and relevant retrievals; no duplicates non-relevant retrievals removed from manual review; duplicates of and between:
- relevant retrievals
- non-relevant retrievals
raw retrievals; duplicates of and between retrievals