Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 May 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barnaby Reeves|
|2 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Bero|
|11 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Deirdre Price|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barnaby Reeves|
|23 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Deirdre Price|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jun 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Herxheimer|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Jun 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|5 Jul 2007||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jul 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-7-32|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.