Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Apr 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
13 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic
4 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M Chew
18 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcus Muellner
31 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Kay Dickersin
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M Chew
2 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcus Muellner
4 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
25 Sep 2007 Editorially accepted
25 Sep 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-7-44

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement