Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Differential response effects of data collection mode in a cancer screening study of unmarried women ages 40–75 years: A randomized trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jul 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mira Katz
5 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan slater
8 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Melissa Clark
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan slater
9 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mira Katz
2 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Melissa Clark
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Melissa Clark
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Feb 2008 Editorially accepted
29 Feb 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement