This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Differential response effects of data collection mode in a cancer screening study of unmarried women ages 40–75 years: A randomized trial
- Melissa A Clark1Email author,
- Michelle L Rogers†1,
- Gene F Armstrong†1,
- William Rakowski†1 and
- Frederick J Kviz†2
© Clark et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 24 July 2007
Accepted: 29 February 2008
Published: 29 February 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Jul 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Aug 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mira Katz|
|5 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan slater|
|8 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Melissa Clark|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan slater|
|9 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mira Katz|
|2 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Melissa Clark|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Melissa Clark|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|28 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Feb 2008||Editorially accepted|
|29 Feb 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-8-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.