Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The use of interim data and Data Monitoring Committee recommendations in randomized controlled trial reports: frequency, implications and potential sources of bias

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Aug 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - PUVAN THARMANATHAN
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Curtis Meinert
21 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Robert Sydes
10 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - PUVAN THARMANATHAN
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Robert Sydes
16 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - PUVAN THARMANATHAN
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
20 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement