Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jul 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry
13 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Hopewell
15 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
18 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bagnall
11 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheena Derry
29 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Hopewell
31 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Bagnall
9 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Moher
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - ENRIQUE BERNAL-DELGADO
Resubmission - Version 8
3 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
27 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
27 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement