Skip to main content

Table 1 Factors associated with children's participation at follow-up

From: Determinants of participation in a longitudinal two-stage study of the health consequences of the Chornobyl nuclear power plant accident

 

Participants

(N = 526)b

Non-participants

(N = 73)b

Adjusted for group OR

(95% CI)

Multivariable modelc OR

(95% CI)

Attended clinic at time 1

485 (92.2)

61 (83.6)

2.3 (1.2–4.7) *

--c

Mother participated at follow-up

477 (92.3)

16 (22.5)

41.6 (21.7–79.7) ***

46.9 (23.9–92.1) ***

Background characteristics a

    

Evacuee status

265 (50.4)

34 (46.6)

--

--c

Female child

273 (51.9)

37 (50.7)

1.1 (0.6–1.7)

--c

Child in utero at time of accident

158 (30.0)

25 (34.2)

0.8 (0.5–1.4)

--c

Standard of living, mean ± SDc

3.8 ± 1.6

3.6 ± 1.7

1.1 (0.9–1.4)

--c

University graduate (either parent)

163 (31.0)

23 (31.5)

1.0 (0.6–1.8)

--c

Child well-being a

    

No medical checkup in past year

343 (65.2)

44 (60.3)

1.4 (0.8–2.5)

--c

≥ 2 colds in past year

375 (71.6)

56 (76.7)

0.7 (0.4–1.33)

--c

P-CSI (mother report), mean ± SDd

18.6 ± 14.4

17.6 ± 13.7

1.1 (0.8–1.4)

--c

Childhood behavioral problems

106 (20.2)

14 (19.2)

1.1 (0.6–2.0)

--c

CSI (child self-report), mean ± SDd

16.5 ± 16.0

16.3 ± 18.7

1.0 (0.8–1.3)

--c

Days absent from school

    

   None

170 (34.1)

24 (35.3)

1.0

--c

   1–10 days

227 (45.6)

32 (47.1)

1.0 (0.6–1.8)

--c

   > 10 days

101 (20.3)

12 (17.6)

1.2 (0.6–2.5)

--c

  

linear trend

χ2(1) = 0.2

 

Mother's Chornobyl risk perception a

    

Child's health perceived as very affected by Chornobyl

231 (43.9)

32 (43.8)

1.0 (0.6–1.6)

--c

Distrust of authorities, mean ± SDd

3.1 ± 0.6

3.2 ± 0.6

0.8 (0.7–1.1)

--c

  1. a All variables are based on maternal reports except the child-rated CSI and the school record information on absences. No interactions between these variables and evacuee status were found to be statistically significant.
  2. b Values are numbers (percentage, calculated from total column) except when noted.
  3. c The final multivariable model was obtained following a stepwise backwards likelihood-ratio elimination procedure.
  4. d Continuous variables were standardized in logistic regression models so that the ORs may be interpreted as the odds of participation for a one standard deviation increase in the predictor.
  5. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001