Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reporting of Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) association studies: An empirical assessment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sholom Wacholder
27 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Carlson
10 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ajay Yesupriya
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sholom Wacholder
23 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Carlson
18 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ajay Yesupriya
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ajay Yesupriya
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sholom Wacholder
15 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ajay Yesupriya
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 May 2008 Editorially accepted
20 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-31

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement