Skip to main content

Table 4 Reporting characteristics of the analytic methodology and study inferences for 315 randomly selected HuGE articles (2001–2003)

From: Reporting of Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) association studies: An empirical assessment

Reporting characteristic

Count

Percent

Reported that all genetic variants were examined for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

  

   No

164

52.1

   Yes

151

47.9

If Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was reported, did any polymorphism reportedly fail Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (n = 151)

  

   No

141

93.4

   Yes

10

6.6

Summary data reported on all genetic variants of interest for all outcomes

  

   No

41

13.0

   Yes

274

87.0

Reported that analyses were conducted by using allele-based genetic comparisons

  

   No

143

45.4

   Yes

172

54.6

Reported that analyses were conducted by using genotype-based genetic comparisons

  

   No

45

14.3

   Yes

270

85.7

If the analyses were conducted by using genotypes, were selected comparisons or all possible comparisons assessed (n = 270)

  

   All possible

214

79.3

   Selected

56

20.7

Justifications given for the selection of specific genetic comparisons (n = 56)

  

   No

33

58.9

   Yes

23

41.1

Adjustment for multiple comparisons used

  

   No

276

87.6

   Yes

39

12.4

If an adjustment for multiple comparisons was used, type of adjustment was (n = 40, one article used two methods)

  

   Bonferroni

28

70.0

   Fischer's post hoc

1

2.5

   Monte Carlo simulations

1

2.5

   Scheffe's test

2

5.0

   Tukey's test

3

7.5

   Unknown

5

12.5

Authors discussed the public health, medical, or clinical implications of their findings

  

   No

193

61.3

   Yes (any mention)

122

38.7

Authors stated that this is the first study on the specific issue

  

   No

266

84.4

   Yes

49

15.6

Clear reference made to the first study on the specific issue (n = 266)

  

   No

243

91.4

   Yes

23

8.6

Clear reference made to a systematic review

  

   No

297

94.3

   Yes

18

5.7

Clear reference made to a non-systematic review

  

   No

309

98.1

   Yes

6

1.9