Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Apr 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
23 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Myfanwy Lloyd Jones
30 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Rodgers
7 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Jul 2008 Editorially accepted
10 Jul 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement