Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Examining assumptions regarding valid electronic monitoring of medication therapy: development of a validation framework and its application on a European sample of kidney transplant patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 May 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramani Durvasula
17 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eyal Shemesh
25 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Urquhart
30 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raymond Ownby
1 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cynthia Russell
12 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Kris Denhaerynck
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramani Durvasula
24 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jesse Berlin
27 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Raymond Ownby
27 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers
5 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alistair Stewart
5 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruairidh Milne
1 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kris Denhaerynck
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kris Denhaerynck
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Feb 2008 Editorially accepted
19 Feb 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement