Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Aug 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Friedrich
16 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Riley
18 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guido Knapp
18 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julian Higgins
18 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon
13 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Gerta Rücker
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julian Higgins
31 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Riley
12 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Gerta Rücker
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Gerta Rücker
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Nov 2008 Editorially accepted
27 Nov 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-8-79

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement