Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Aug 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David J Torgerson
31 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jesse Berlin
31 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Lau
22 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Peter Gøtzsche
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David J Torgerson
4 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jesse Berlin
21 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Peter Gøtzsche
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jesse Berlin
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Peter Gøtzsche
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
5 Jan 2009 Editorially accepted
5 Jan 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement