Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
© Moreno et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 22 August 2008
Accepted: 12 January 2009
Published: 12 January 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Aug 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker|
|30 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joao Paulo Souza|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Santiago G Moreno|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Nov 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker|
|14 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joao Paulo Souza|
|11 Jan 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Santiago G Moreno|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Jan 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Jan 2009||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jan 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-9-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.