Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lehana Thabane
7 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian V. Hernandez
14 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - morgane ethgen
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lehana Thabane
27 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian V. Hernandez
16 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - morgane ethgen
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - morgane ethgen
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Apr 2009 Editorially accepted
9 Apr 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-24

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement