Skip to main content

Table 1 Reports' characteristics

From: Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention

 

n (%)

n = 132

Journal

 

   General medical journal

20 (15.2)

   Circulation

15 (11.4)

   American Heart Journal

14 (10.6)

   Catheter and Cardiovascular Intervention

18 (13.6)

   Journal of the American College of Cardiology

17 (12.9)

   American Journal of Cardiology

15 (11.4)

   Other

33 (25.0)

Funding

 

   Public funding

16 (12.1)

   Manufacturer funding

49(37.1)

   Both public and manufacturer funding

7 (5.3)

   No funding

3 (2.3)

   Not reported

57 (43.2)

Interventions

 

   BMS

41 (31.1)

   Polymer-coated stent

19 (14.4)

   DES

64 (48.5)

   Strategy of stent implantation

8 (6.1)

Comparisons (experimental intervention vs control arm)

 

   DES vs BMS

35 (26.5)

   DES vs another DES

19 (14.4)

   DES vs same DES but with a different dosage

5 (3.8)

   DES vs balloon angioplasty

6 (4.5)

   DES vs polymer-coated stent

3 (2.3)

   DES vs surgery

1 (0.8)

   Polymer-coated stent vs BMS

13 (9.8)

   Polymer-coated stent vs angioplasty

3 (2.3)

   BMS vs another BMS

13 (9.8)

   BMS vs angioplasty

10 (7.6)

   BMS vs surgery

9 (6.8)

   BMS vs a strategy of stent implantation

6 (6.8)

   Strategy of stent implantation vs another strategy of stent implantation

4 (3.0)

   Strategy of stent implantation vs angioplasty

5 (3.8)

  1. BMS = bare-metal stent
  2. DES = drug-eluting stent