This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessing quality of life in a randomized clinical trial: Correcting for missing data
© Gunnes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 18 December 2008
Accepted: 30 April 2009
Published: 30 April 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Dec 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Henderson|
|30 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Juni Palmgren|
|9 Mar 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Nina Gunnes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Mar 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Henderson|
|23 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Juni Palmgren|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Apr 2009||Editorially accepted|
|30 Apr 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-9-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.