Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Lau
17 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Spiegelhalter
30 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Alex Sutton
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Lau
11 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Alex Sutton
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Alex Sutton
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Alex Sutton
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
27 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Alex Sutton
Resubmission - Version 9
27 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
30 Apr 2009 Editorially accepted
30 Apr 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-29

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement